Planning on converting T2 maps into T3?
cant wait.. woot... : )
*oh and first.. : )
Anyone?
by vXKitiaraXv » Sun Apr 27, 2003 2:02 am
ooo...i would love to remake Katabatic...NO ONE STEAL MY IDEA DAMNIT!!!
vXKitiaraXv
- vXKitiaraXv offline
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 9:03 pm
- Location: Working at McDonalds, making delicious Sausage McMuffins with Zen Eggs for the public to enjoy.
- Dr. Pimento offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 2273
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 5:36 pm
- Location: Kansas.. lost near the middle.
by TsN|Byte » Sun Apr 27, 2003 3:07 am
I'm sure remakes will be coming, and I know a few of us already have some ideas planned to be rdy by release, if not sooner, depending on availability of tools
Can You Say 'Weeerrrrreeeee BACK!'
- TsN|Byte offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:56 am
by Red Five » Sun Apr 27, 2003 3:19 am
Sorry, but I'm not into the concept of remakes. For all we know, the T:V physics will make T2 maps practically unplayable. Besides, I'd rather see some good original maps rather than new versions of the old maps, no matter how faithfully recreated.
"...this map deserves an A+, because it was thought out, planned out, and created to be a massive mortarfest."
-- Red Shifter, with regard to
-- Red Shifter, with regard to
- Red Five offline
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 1:13 am
- Location: Running a counterfeit ZEN egg operation in the Bahamas
by TsN|Byte » Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:13 am
I would tend to agree, I am not one for alot of remakes, but there are some that should be done. As far as not being doable cause of physics, then it is modified and tweaked to work with whats there, we're not talking 100% remakes 
Can You Say 'Weeerrrrreeeee BACK!'
- TsN|Byte offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:56 am
- vXKitiaraXv offline
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 9:03 pm
- Location: Working at McDonalds, making delicious Sausage McMuffins with Zen Eggs for the public to enjoy.
by TsN|Byte » Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:49 am
Im talking about if they physics of T:V doesnt allow anything close to a 'full' remake terrain wise, which I suspect will be true. Then you as a map maker would want to just modify the terrain etc, not modify physics
Can You Say 'Weeerrrrreeeee BACK!'
- TsN|Byte offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:56 am
by v5planet » Sun Apr 27, 2003 9:08 am
I think I'd probably make a sequel to Stardust, but only because I never got anything just the way I wanted in it in Torque. UED should offer me something that'sa lot more flexible, where I can make a lot more "moonlike" features. Plus......I'm sure UED can handle transparent textures, which means I can make bases and tunnels that are glassed in like bubbles......ooooooh, the potential.
- v5planet offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 7:36 pm
- Location: Connecticut
by starstriker1 » Sun Apr 27, 2003 9:33 am
Right now, the idea of T:V map concepts is pointless. We know absolutely nothing about the game, other than that its with the unreal engine, and it has upside down spinfusor disks. 
I'd wait until we get some REAL info.
I'd wait until we get some REAL info.
To thy foolish whiners of the deathmatch: http://www.forumplanet.com/planettribes ... tid=816710
- starstriker1 offline
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: Wandering aimlessly in Canada
by v5planet » Sun Apr 27, 2003 9:59 am
Actually, the spinfusor is going to shoot discs horizontally. There was something up on planettribes.com about that....the vertical disc was just representative of an older model or something.
- v5planet offline
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 7:36 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest